■ Tax & legal research · In pilot
It cites the article, or it stops.
A research tool a professional can check in seconds is a different thing from a chatbot they cannot. The citation is not a feature, it is the product.
In pilot and not yet released, deliberately. The honest blocker: on one real client question the default model wrote out a filing procedure that does not exist. A fabricated tax procedure in front of an accountant is worse than no answer, so it does not go in front of one until that is closed.
4,191
searchable passages across 23 primary documents
313
automated tests passing
0
answers without a source
Detail
Answers in Bulgarian, with the article cited.
- It holds the law, not a summary23 documents and 4,191 searchable passages: ЗДДС, ЗКПО, ЗДДФЛ, ДОПК, КСО, ЗОП, ЗВО, СБО/ЕБК, real НАП opinions and the double-taxation treaties.
- It refuses instead of inventingAsked a procedure that is not in its documents, it names which steps it cannot ground and stops. For a tax tool this is the most valuable behaviour it has.
- It checks its own numbersIf an answer states a decision, an order or an article number that is not in the sources it was given, the answer carries a visible warning listing exactly which references are unverified.
- Each firm's documents stay that firm'sShared law is loaded once and serves everybody. A firm's own internal documents are seen only by that firm.
- Built for people who are not AI peopleA topic picker with ready-made questions, clarifying questions early, and a turn cap that starts a fresh session rather than letting answers quietly get worse.